style, tributes

Audrey Hepburn: Still The Fairest Lady

1 Comment 22 January 2007

Time Magazine wrote their own tribute to our lovely Audrey on the 14th anniversary of her death. At first, I was wishing I had just posted their story instead of writing my own awkwardly expressed tribute, but the more I read, the more I was disgusted that this article was printed by no less than Time. While starting out as a lovely remembrance for one of the few top-notch celebrities who lived their life drama-free and managed to turn their life into something meaningful, it quickly degenerates into a crass article that you’d think was talking about Lindsay Lohan or some other tartlet that isn’t held very high in anyone’s esteem. To give you some lowlights of this “serious piece,” author Richard Corliss accuses Audrey of having anorexia during her UNICEF work to make the starving children she was visiting feel better about themselves, and gives a very crass image of Albert Finney’s attraction to Audrey during filming of Two For the Road. I understand the idea behind not whitewashing the past and being wary of putting anyone on too high a pedestal, but why is making up drama considered an okay thing to do? In journalism, no less! Audrey faced this even in her own life, and she said, “If you lead a simple life, and that story is written, then that story will not satisfy. It needs an angle. Suppose there is no angle?” I guess Time‘s answer is, “Make something up.” If you’d like, you can read the story for yourself (note that there are two pages), and then click on the author’s name to write him a letter.

Seemingly in answer to the work mentioned above comes another article called “What Ever Became of Class?” Though it’s not particularly an Audrey-heavy article, it does draw heavily on her image and that aura she and a few others had of real grace and style. Audrey’s name was evoked a lot in recap articles about the Golden Globes, and it seems that people are finally realizing that Hollywood has lost its class. “Where’s Audrey Hepburn when you need her?” columnists wailed, and in today’s article, Audrey, Grace Kelly and Jacky Kennedy are invoked to remind women of a more subtle femininity. Girls today are taught how to be women by buying toy stripper poles and wearing tube tops. Has subtlety died when we weren’t looking? The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note, and invokes a line from the aforementioned Sam Levenson poem Audrey loved, talking about a women’s charm:

“. . . The beauty of a woman is not in the clothes she wears, the figure that she carries, or the way she combs her hair. The beauty of a woman must be seen from in her eyes, because that is the doorway to her heart, the place where love resides.”

You can also follow us here:

Your Comments

1 comment

  1. Thank you for your website.
    Definitely style icon and forever. It’s what a lady should be. No tatoos, no rings on face, no foul language. That’s why the whole world loves her. Too bad today’s society is corrupt with women who let themselves be influenced and not look or act lady-like like Audrey Hepburn. Miss her lots. Thank you again. Always admired and always remembered.


Share your view

Post a comment

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 22,446 bad guys.

All original content © 2003-2017 The Fabulous Audrey Hepburn.Powered by Wordpress.

Wordpress themes by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes

You are protected by wp-dephorm: